Eating disorders (EDs) are serious mental illnesses, not lifestyle choices or fleeting obsessions. Yet, widespread myths thrive—fueling stigma, delaying care, and endangering lives. Today, we’re dispelling the most common myths about eating disorders using peer‑reviewed research and expert consensus to offer clarity, compassion, and hope.
Myth 1: Eating disorders are a choice.
Reality: Eating disorders arise from a complex interplay of genetic, biological, psychological and environmental factors—not willpower or vanity. People do not choose these illnesses any more than they choose cancer or diabetes. Research has identified several genetic variants associated with anorexia nervosa, including genes related to metabolism and psychiatric conditions (Watson et al., Nature Genetics, 2019).
Read more: No One Chooses to Have an Eating Disorder
Myth 2: Only girls and young women get eating disorders
Reality: Eating disorders affect people of all genders and ages. While females are more likely to be diagnosed, a 2022 report from the National Eating Disorders Association (NEDA) noted that one in three people with an eating disorder is male, and that men are often less likely to be diagnosed due to gender bias in screening tools and stereotypes about who “gets” eating disorders.
Myth 3: Only "thin" people can have eating disorders
Reality: Eating disorders can occur at any weight. Atypical anorexia nervosa, where individuals meet all criteria for anorexia except low weight, is recognized in the DSM-5 and is considered just as medically dangerous as typical anorexia nervosa (Sawyer et al., Journal of Adolescent Health, 2016).
People in larger bodies often experience delays in eating disorder treatment because of weight stigma and the false belief that weight loss is always healthy for them—even when they show the same emotional distress and medical risks as those in thinner bodies. (Puhl & Suh, Current Obesity Reports, 2015).
Myth 4: Eating disorders aren’t that serious
Reality: Anorexia nervosa has the highest mortality rate of any psychiatric disorder, with both medical complications and suicide contributing to the risk (Arcelus et al., Archives of General Psychiatry, 2011). Bulimia and binge eating disorder are also associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal distress, diabetes, and mood disorders.
Myth 5: The media causes eating disorders
Reality: Media influence can reinforce unhealthy body ideals, but it is not a direct cause of eating disorders. According to the Academy for Eating Disorders, sociocultural pressures can contribute to body dissatisfaction, but genetic predisposition, trauma, anxiety, and perfectionistic personality traits are stronger predictors of who develops an ED (Levine & Murnen, 2009, Clinical Psychology Review). Media may fuel the fire—but it doesn’t light the match.
Myth 6: Families are to blame for eating disorders
Reality: Families do not cause eating disorders. While a family history of disordered eating may increase genetic risk, environmental triggers are diverse. In fact, family-based therapy is a leading treatment for adolescents with anorexia nervosa and often results in better outcomes than individual therapy (Lock et al., 2010, JAMA Psychiatry). Supportive family involvement is a protective factor, not a cause.
Myth 7: Eating disorders only affect white, wealthy, Western populations.
Reality: Eating disorders exist across all racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic groups. Data from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication found similar or higher rates of binge eating disorder among Black and Hispanic populations compared to white populations (Alegria et al., 2007, Int J Eat Disord.). However, people of color are significantly less likely to be diagnosed or referred to treatment, in part due to implicit bias among clinicians (Becker et al., 2003, Int J Eat Disord.).
Myth 8: It's impossible to recover from an eating disorder
Reality: Recovery is absolutely possible—and it happens every day.
The belief that people with eating disorders never fully recover is not only false, it’s deeply harmful. This myth fosters hopelessness, discourages individuals from seeking care, and can even delay or derail recovery altogether. In reality, with timely, evidence-based treatment, most individuals can and do recover—not just from the physical symptoms, but from the underlying emotional and psychological distress as well.
A 22-year longitudinal study published in the American Journal of Psychiatry found that more than 60% of individuals with anorexia or bulimia nervosa recovered fully, and many others achieved significant symptom reduction and improved quality of life (Eddy et al., 2017). Recovery looks different for each person, but lasting healing is absolutely within reach.
Finding Hope + Healing
At Magnolia Creek, we believe you deserve to recover and live a fulfilling life, free from the chains an eating disorder places on you. We also believe that healing must address the whole person. Our treatment philosophy is grounded in compassion, clinical excellence, and the understanding that eating disorders are complex illnesses that require individualized care. That’s why we treat not just symptoms, but the underlying emotional, physical, and spiritual wounds.
If you’re ready to start on the road to recovery, support is available at Magnolia Creek. Reach out today to speak with an admissions specialist. Your journey can begin here.
Magnolia Creek is dually licensed to treat eating disorders and a multitude of co-occurring disorders. We tailor our treatment plans to individual needs and goals while empowering every client in our care to embrace recovery with resilience and independence.
Sources
Arcelus et al. (2011). Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders. Archives of General Psychiatry.
Alegria et al. (2007). Prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in Latinos, African Americans, and Asians in the United States. International Journal of Eating Disorders.
Becker et al. (2003). Ethnicity and eating disorder risk in college women. International Journal of Eating Disorders.
Caslini et al. (2016). Child abuse and eating disorders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine.
Eddy et al. (2017). Recovery from anorexia and bulimia at 22-year follow-up. American Journal of Psychiatry.
Hay et al. (2015). Prevalence of DSM-5 eating disorders in Australia. Journal of Eating Disorders.
Levine & Murnen (2009). Media, body image, and disordered eating in females. Clinical Psychology Review.
Lock et al. (2010). “Family-Based Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa: A Randomized Controlled Trial.” JAMA Psychiatry.
Lutter et al. (2017). Genetic links to anorexia: Role of HDAC4 and ESRRA. Journal of Psychiatric Research.
NEDA (2022). “Statistics & Research on Eating Disorders.” National Eating Disorders Association.
- Puhl & Suh (2015). “Weight Stigma and Eating Disorders in Diverse Populations.” Current Obesity Reports
Sawyer et al. (2016). Atypical anorexia and medical/psychological risks in teens. International Journal of Eating Disorders.